25 research outputs found

    <i>FGFR1</i> Amplification Is Often Homogeneous and Strongly Linked to the Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subtype in Esophageal Carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Background and aimsAmplification of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is believed to predict response to multi-kinase inhibitors targeting FGFR1. Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease, for which novel targeted therapies are highly warranted.MethodsThis study was designed to investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of FGFR1 amplification in a tissue microarray containing 346 adenocarcinomas and 254 squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, using dual-labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis.ResultsFGFR1 amplification, defined as a ratio of FGFR1:centromere 8 copy numbers ≥ 2.0, was more frequently seen in squamous cell carcinoma (8.9% of 202 interpretable cases) than in adenocarcinoma (1.6% of 308; pConclusionsIn conclusion, FGFR1 amplification occurs in a relevant subgroup of carcinomas of the esophagus and may play a particular role for development of squamous cell cancers. The high homogeneity of FGFR1 amplification suggests that patients with FGFR1 amplified esophageal cancers may particularly benefit from anti-FGFR1 therapies and prompt for clinical studies in this tumor type

    The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer statement on best practices for multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining and validation.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: The interaction between the immune system and tumor cells is an important feature for the prognosis and treatment of cancer. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) analyses are emerging technologies that can be used to help quantify immune cell subsets, their functional state, and their spatial arrangement within the tumor microenvironment. METHODS: The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a task force of pathologists and laboratory leaders from academic centers as well as experts from pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies to develop best practice guidelines for the optimization and validation of mIHC/mIF assays across platforms. RESULTS: Representative outputs and the advantages and disadvantages of mIHC/mIF approaches, such as multiplexed chromogenic IHC, multiplexed immunohistochemical consecutive staining on single slide, mIF (including multispectral approaches), tissue-based mass spectrometry, and digital spatial profiling are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: mIHC/mIF technologies are becoming standard tools for biomarker studies and are likely to enter routine clinical practice in the near future. Careful assay optimization and validation will help ensure outputs are robust and comparable across laboratories as well as potentially across mIHC/mIF platforms. Quantitative image analysis of mIHC/mIF output and data management considerations will be addressed in a complementary manuscript from this task force

    PGK1 and CXCR4 expression, proliferation and inhibition of CXCR4 of neuroblastoma cell lines.

    No full text
    <p>Kelly (<b>A</b>) and SH-EP Tet-21/N (<b>B</b>) neuroblastoma cells were immunostained for PGK1 and CXCR4 expression (<b>Immunohistochemistry</b>). Both cell lines show a positivity for CXCR4 and react to treatment with 20 µg AMD3100 with an inhibition of proliferation (<b>MTT-assay</b>), although only SH-EP Tet-21/N cells reach a significant level of growth reduction. On examination of PGK1 protein expression levels (<b>Western blot</b>) after 48 h of CXCR4 receptor inhibition, treatment with 20 µg AMD3100 leads to a downregulation of PGK1 protein (45 kDa) in SH-EP Tet-21/N but not in Kelly cells. Tubulin (55 kDa) served as control.</p

    Overall Survival.

    No full text
    <p>For Kaplan-Meier survival analysis patients were grouped according to positive and negative PGK1 expression. All patients that died during the follow-up period showed positive PGK1 expression, while none of the PGK1 negative patients died. Overall survival of neuroblastoma patients with a PGK1 negative expression was significantly better than that of PGK1 positive patients (<i>p = 0.003</i>).</p

    <i>FGFR1</i> Amplification Is Often Homogeneous and Strongly Linked to the Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subtype in Esophageal Carcinoma

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Background and Aims</p><p>Amplification of the <i>fibroblast growth factor receptor 1</i> (<i>FGFR1</i>) is believed to predict response to multi-kinase inhibitors targeting <i>FGFR1</i>. Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease, for which novel targeted therapies are highly warranted.</p><p>Methods</p><p>This study was designed to investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of <i>FGFR1</i> amplification in a tissue microarray containing 346 adenocarcinomas and 254 squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, using dual-labeling fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization (FISH) analysis.</p><p>Results</p><p><i>FGFR1</i> amplification, defined as a ratio of <i>FGFR1</i>:centromere 8 copy numbers ≥ 2.0, was more frequently seen in squamous cell carcinoma (8.9% of 202 interpretable cases) than in adenocarcinoma (1.6% of 308; p<0.0001). There was no association between <i>FGFR1</i> amplification and tumor phenotype or clinical outcome. To study potential heterogeneity of <i>FGFR1</i> amplification, all available tumor blocks from 23 <i>FGFR1</i> amplified tumors were analyzed on conventional large sections. This analysis revealed complete homogeneity of <i>FGFR1</i> amplification in 20 (86.9%) primary tumors and in all available lymph node metastases. Remarkably, <i>FGFR1</i> amplification was also seen in dysplasia adjacent to tumor in 6 of 9 patients with <i>FGFR1</i> amplified primary cancers.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In conclusion, <i>FGFR1</i> amplification occurs in a relevant subgroup of carcinomas of the esophagus and may play a particular role for development of squamous cell cancers. The high homogeneity of <i>FGFR1</i> amplification suggests that patients with <i>FGFR1</i> amplified esophageal cancers may particularly benefit from anti-<i>FGFR1</i> therapies and prompt for clinical studies in this tumor type.</p></div
    corecore